Serial bus: UNLSN, UNTLK, and a missing device leave the bus released

UNLSN ended through iec_set_idle, which pulls CLK, so the C64 kept
holding CLK after UNLISTEN. UNTLK waited for the talker to pull CLK,
which no device does after UNTALK, timed out, and left CLK pulled with
carry set. And a serial routine that found no device also left CLK
pulled. A fastloader that waits for the drive to pull CLK after the
KERNAL's UNLSN (Turrican's) then went on too early.

The contract (Michael Steil, "Commodore Peripheral Bus: Part 4",
https://www.pagetable.com/?p=1135): at the end of a transmission the
sender releases CLK and the receivers release DATA, so the bus is idle
again, and the controller releases ATN after each command; after
UNTALK "the current talker will then release the bus" (Part 2,
https://www.pagetable.com/?p=1031). UNLSN and UNTLK now share their end
and release CLK and DATA; the device-not-present exit releases ATN, CLK,
and DATA. Commodore's ROMs leave the same lines in the same scenarios,
as differential tests in arnitech show.

Not reported upstream (https://github.com/MEGA65/open-roms).

src/kernal/iec/iec_return.s

@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ iec_return_success:
 
 iec_return_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND:
 
-	; Set IEC line to normal idle state
-	jsr iec_set_idle
+	; Nobody answers: release all lines, so the bus is idle - see https://www.pagetable.com/?p=1135
+	jsr iec_release_atn_clk_data
 
 	; BSOUR is certainly not valid anymore
 	lda #$00

src/kernal/iec/unlsn.s

@@ -42,7 +42,15 @@ UNLSN:
 	; Buffer empty, send the command
 	lda #$3F
 
-	jmp common_open_close_unlsn_second
+common_unlsn_untlk: ; common part of UNLSN and UNTLK
+
+	jsr common_open_close_unlsn_second
+	bcs @1
+
+	; The transmission is over: release CLK and DATA too, so the bus is idle - see https://www.pagetable.com/?p=1135
+	jmp iec_release_clk_data
+@1:
+	rts
 
 } else {
 

src/kernal/iec/untlk.s

@@ -39,10 +39,11 @@ UNTLK:
 	sta IECPROTO
 }
 
-	; Buffer empty, send the command
+	; Buffer empty, send the command; the talker releases the bus - see https://www.pagetable.com/?p=1031
 	lda #$5F
+	jmp common_unlsn_untlk
 
-common_untlk_tksa: ; common part of UNTLK and TKSA
+common_untlk_tksa: ; the rest of TKSA
 
 	; XXX - for TKSA, is it really the right place to do a turnaround? I have some doubts
 	; (it forces us to send the TKSA command 'manually' sometimes), but